FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 10: Externalities

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 31

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Although regulation and corrective taxes are both capable of reducing pollution, regulation accomplishes this goal more efficiently.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 32

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Figure 10-6 ​ -Refer to Figure 10-6. If the government imposed a corrective tax that successfully moved the market from the market equilibrium to the social optimum, then tax revenue for the government would amount to

A) $2,600.
B) $300.
C) $2,000.
D) $2,300.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 33

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Figure 10-3 -Refer to Figure 10-3. If the government wanted to tax or subsidize this good to achieve the socially optimal level of output, it would

Government can be used to solve externality problems that are too costly for private parties to solve.

Scenario 10-1 The demand curve for gasoline slopes downward and the supply curve for gasoline slopes upward. The production of the 400th gallon of gasoline entails the following: a private cost of $2.83; a social cost of $3.12; a value to consumers of $3.23. -Refer to Scenario 10-1. Suppose the equilibrium quantity of gasoline is 440 gallons; that is, Q_MARKET = 440. Then the equilibrium price of a gallon could be

Economists believe that the optimal level of pollution is zero.

Table 10-3 ​ ​ $\begin{array} { | c | c | c | c | } \hline \begin{array} { c } \text { Quantity } \\\text { (Units) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Private Value } \\\text { (Dollars) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Private Cost } \\\text { (Dollars) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { External Benefit } \\\text { (Dollars) }\end{array} \\\hline 1 & 22 & 12 & 10 \\\hline 2 & 20 & 15 & 10 \\\hline 3 & 18 & 18 & 10 \\\hline 4 & 16 & 21 & 10 \\\hline 5 & 14 & 24 & 10 \\\hline 6 & 12 & 27 & 10 \\\hline\end{array}$ -Refer to Table 10-3. What amount of subsidy per unit of output would move the market from the equilibrium level of output to the socially optimal level of output?

Figure 10-2 -Refer to Figure 10-2. Without government intervention, the equilibrium quantity would be

Does research into new technologies create a positive externality or does it create a negative externality?

Suppose that coal producers create a negative externality equal to $5 per ton of coal. What is the relationship between the equilibrium quantity of coal and the socially optimal quantity of coal?

Table 10-2 ​ ​ $\begin{array} { | c | c | c | c | } \hline \begin{array} { c } \text { Quantity } \\\text { (Units) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Private Value } \\\text { (Dollars) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Private Cost } \\\text { (Dollars) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Social Value } \\\text { (Dollars) }\end{array} \\\hline 1 & 51 & 45 & 57 \\\hline 2 & 48 & 48 & 54 \\\hline 3 & 45 & 51 & 51 \\\hline 4 & 42 & 54 & 48 \\\hline 5 & 39 & 57 & 45 \\\hline 6 & 36 & 60 & 42 \\\hline\end{array}$ ​ -Refer to Table 10-2. How large would a subsidy need to be in this market to move the market from the equilibrium level of output to the socially optimal level of output?

Figure 10-2 -Refer to Figure 10-2. The socially optimal quantity would be

Describe the circumstances under which it would be better for the government to sell pollution permits than to levy a corrective tax.

​Sophia sits behind Gabriel on an airplane. Gabriel owns the right to recline his seat and values this right at $10. Sophia values a non-reclined seat in front of her at $20. Assuming no transaction costs, an efficient solution would be for Sophia to pay Gabriel $15 to not recline his seat. ​

According to recent research, the gas tax in the United States is lower than the optimal level.

If the social value of producing robots is greater than the private value of producing robots, the private market produces too few robots.

In some circumstances, selling pollution permits may be better than levying a corrective tax.

Figure 10-4 -Refer to Figure 10-4, Graph (b) and Graph (c) . The installation of a scrubber in a smokestack reduces the emission of harmful chemicals from the smokestack. Therefore, the external benefit of smokestack scrubber installation is represented by

Negative externalities lead markets to produce a smaller quantity of a good than is socially desirable, while positive externalities lead markets to produce a larger quantity of a good than is socially desirable.

Figure 10-7 -Refer to Figure 10-7. This graph shows the market for pollution when permits are issued to firms and traded in the marketplace. The equilibrium number of permits is